Fighter Sweep
  • Home
  • Military Aviation
  • Air Force
  • Navy
  • Spec Ops
  • Expert Analysis
  • Careers
  • Photos
Home Previous Post Next Post
Follow @fightersweep

The Avrocar: America’s secret flying saucer that barely made it off the ground

December 8, 2018
Alex Hollings No Comments History, Military Aviation

For decades, people all over the world have reported seeing saucer-shaped crafts darting across the sky. These sightings are attributed to any number of things: swamp gas, ball lightning, and of course, extra-terrestrials visiting Earth. If you happened to spot one near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in the late 1950’s however, there’s a chance it didn’t come from a faraway galaxy… It probably came from Canada.

In 1952, the Canadian government provided initial funding for what would come to be called the Avrocar; a saucer-shaped aircraft intended to offer vertical takeoff and landing capabilities in a supersonic fighter-bomber of the future. The cost of development, however, would soon prove to be too much for the Canadian government, prompting them to scrap the Avrocar project, and allowing the United States to sign a deal with Avro to continue development for the American military under the title “Project 1794.”

The design for the Avrocar was based on using the exhaust from the turbojet engines to power a circular “turborotor” that would create thrust. When pointed downward, the thrust would create a cushion of air known as a “ground effect” that would permit it to hover. When redirected out the back of the saucer-shaped craft, it was hoped to propel the Avrocar to speeds in excess of MACH 2.

Design cutaway courtesy of the U.S. National Archive

Two vehicles were produced, with the designation VZ-9AV Avrocar, and were sent to Wright-Patterson for testing. “VZ” stood for “experimental vertical flight,” “9” for the ninth concept proposal, and “AV” for Avro, the company that produced the models.

The Army and Air Force were both on the market for different types of vehicles; the Army wanted a subsonic, all terrain troop transport and reconnaissance craft, while the Air Force was on the market for a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) craft that could hover below enemy radar before zooming off at supersonic speeds. Early designs and projections of the Avrocar’s performance led officials from both branches to believe they may be able to get everything they were each looking for from a single platform. One declassified memo from the project’s development claimed the saucer would be capable of “between Mach 3 and Mach 4,” (2,300-3,000 mph), a service ceiling of over 100,000 feet (30,500m), and a range of around 1,000 nautical miles (1,150mi, 1850km).

Unfortunately for both the Army and Air Force, however, the test results would prove underwhelming.

Tests conducted at Wright-Patterson AFB proved the “ground effect” air cushion beneath the craft would become dangerously unstable just a few feet off the ground. It was also completely incapable of reaching anything even close to supersonic speeds – having attained a maximum controllable speed of only 35 miles per hour during testing. Wind tunnel tests conducted by America’s fledgling space administration, NASA, showed the design to have insufficient control surfaces for high-speed flight, and led to them declaring the Avrocar “aerodynamically unstable.”

(U.S. Air Force photo)

The Air Force quickly realized the Avrocar would not be able to fit their needs, but development continued for a short time through Army funding, as they still hoped it might eventually come to serve their subsonic purposes. Eventually though, even the Army would give up on having its own fleet of flying saucers.

After the second iteration of the Avrocar failed to be controllable at altitudes any higher than just three feet, the project was scrapped in 1961, relegating the two test model flying saucers to museums. The first prototype found its way to the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force in 2007, and the second eventually wound up in the U.S. Army Transportation Museum at Fort Eustis, Virginia.

Avrocar at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, courtesy if Wikipedia

Although the Avrocar proved to be a disappointment, even disappointments have an intrinsic value through the scope of history. Now, with both Avrocars in museums, they offer a glimpse into our continued drive to innovate.

“They get a feel for what people were doing back then,” says Dave Lazzarine, a restoration supervisor who worked on the Avrocar. He believes engineers still come to see the models for a form of inspiration. Like the team behind the Avrocar, scientists and engineers continue to work to push the boundaries of what we think is possible for a combat aircraft to do.

“They are always trying to invent something that doesn’t exist.” Lazzarine added. Of course, not everyone believes the project was truly ended in 1961, and conspiracy theorists around the world think the flying saucers seen in the skies today may simply be the latest design of U.S. Avrocars.

Unlikely as it may seem, that might offer a better explanation than Martians. So if you ever happen to find yourself witness to a UFO hovering overhead, look for an American flag on the window.

You never know.

 

Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

About the Author

Alex Hollings Alex Hollings writes on a breadth of subjects ranging from fitness to foreign policy, all presented through the lens of his experiences as a U.S. Marine, athlete and scholar. A football player, rugby player and fighter, Hollings has spent the better part of his adult life competing in some of the most physically demanding sports on the planet. Hollings possesses a master's degree in communications from Southern New Hampshire University, as well as a bachelor's degree in Corporate and Organizational Communications from Framingham State University.

Related Posts

  • It turns out the Pentagon’s secret UFO program was more like the ‘X-Files’ than we thoughtIt turns out the Pentagon’s secret UFO program was more like the ‘X-Files’ than we thought
  • Is that a UFO or an airplane? We looked at the data on 60,000 reports since 1995 and found a correlation between sightings and military basesIs that a UFO or an airplane? We looked at the data on 60,000 reports since 1995 and found a correlation between sightings and military bases
  • The UFO Question: Big brained monkeys and interstellar hubrisThe UFO Question: Big brained monkeys and interstellar hubris
  • The UFO Question (Part 3): If aliens are out there, why can’t we hear them?The UFO Question (Part 3): If aliens are out there, why can’t we hear them?
  • The UFO Question Part 2: The Drake Equation and the Fermi ParadoxThe UFO Question Part 2: The Drake Equation and the Fermi Paradox

Find Us on Facebook

FighterSweep.com

Sign Up
for the Newsletter

What’s Hot

  • blue-angels-reporter-blacks-out-passes-out
    December 5, 2017

    Watch: News Reporter Blacks Out on Ride with US Navy Blue Angels

  • September 4, 2019

    Photo Gallery: McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II

  • Whistling Death: How The Corsair Got Its Nickname
    August 30, 2019

    Whistling Death: How the Corsair got its nickname

Follow Us

Facebook Twitter Twitter

Recent Comments

  • pak152 " the team came up with what the Brits dubbed as Mustang, powered by a [...]
  • P K Polish AF never has and never will operate Su-27, An-26 aircraft has been out [...]
  • bnarfhyde The best book is also great. have a [...]
  • TerrorTrike ive never survived this long with such a clumsy FL- cG.866B.CO/NC6155hc
  • D4rksupeme yessss truck kunnnnnnnn i needddd you m.866E.CO/vC6155H

© Copyright 2023 SOFREP Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertisers
 

Loading Comments...